ABSTRACT
KEYWORDS
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
A total of 53 neonates with S. aureus sepsis and 106 matched uninfected controls (matched at a 1:2 ratio) were included in the final analysis, resulting in a study cohort of 159 infants. As presented in Table 1, demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. During the sevenyear study period, 53 neonates were diagnosed with S. aureus BSI. Given the approximately 10.000 live births per year at our center, this corresponds to an estimated annual incidence of 0.76 S. aureus sepsis cases per 1.000 live births. Mean gestational age was 38 weeks (min-max; 34-41) in the S. aureus group. A total of 86.8% (46/53) of S. aureus sepsis episodes occurred in term infants (≥37 weeks’ gestation), with the majority of cases seen in those born early term (37- 38+6 weeks), accounting for 50.9% (27/53). In the S. aureus group, comorbidities were identified in 13 (24.5%) neonates. These were including congenital heart disease (n= 4; one with prior valvuloplasty), Rh incompatibility requiring exchange transfusion (n= 3), cephalhematoma (n= 1), operated anal
| Characteristics |
SA Group n= 53 |
Control Group n= 106 |
p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (wks), mean (min-max) | 38 (34-41) | 38 (34-41) | 0.92 |
| Birth weight (g), mean (min-max) | 3113 (2090-4500) | 3021 (1980-3800) | 0.2 |
| Sex (F/M), n (%) | 32/21 (60.4/39.6) | 43/63 (40.6/59.4) | 28 |
| Late preterm (<37 wks), n (%) | 7 (13.2) | 14 (13.2) | 0.91 |
| Early term (37-38+6), n (%) | 27 (50.9) | 54 (50.9) | NA |
| Full term (39-40+6), n (%) | 17 (32.1) | 34 (32.1) | NA |
| Late term (41-41+6), n (%) | 2 (3.8) | 4 (3.8) | NA |
SA: Staphylococcus aureus, F: Female, M: Male, wks: Weeks, g: Grams.
| Variable | SA Group | Control Group | OR | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical ventilation, n (%) | 14 (26.4) | 57 (53.8) | 2.03 | 1.16-3.58 | 0.0019 |
| Catheter presence, n (%) | 43 (81.1) | 85 (80.2) | 1.33 | 0.55-3.22 | 1.0 |
| TPN use, n (%) | 25 (47.2) | 56 (52.8) | 1.26 | 0.67-2.39 | 0.6137 |
| LOS before infection, days; mean (min-max) | 0.83 (0-9) | 0.1 (0-5) | 12.09 | 2.54-57.5 | 0.0002 |
| Total length of stay, days; mean (min-max) | 14.1 (8-36) | 14.2 (6-36) | 0.79 | 0.4-1.55 | 0.6277 |
| Antibiotic treatment duration days; mean (min-max) | 11.6 (7-28) | 10.4 (0-27) | 0.83 | 0.42-1.61 | 0.1474 |
| Total days with catheter, days; mean (min-max) | 8.9 (0-17) | 8.2 (0-23) | 1.99 | 1.02-3.88 | 0.1235 |
| MSSA (n= 20) | MRSA (n= 33) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, female, n (%) | 14 (70) | 18 (54.5) | 0.409 |
| Gestational age (mean ± SD) | 38.0 ± 1.2 | 38.1 ± 1.4 | 0.697 |
| Mode of delivery (vaginal), n (%) | 12 (60.0%) | 19 (57.6) | 1.000 |
| Catheter use, n (%) | 15 (75.0%) | 28 (84.8) | 0.599 |
| TPN use, n (%) | 6 (30.0%) | 19 (57.6) | 0.096 |
| Mechanical ventilation, n (%) | 4 (20.0%) | 10 (30.3) | 0.615 |
| Total length of hospital stay (days) (mean ± SD) | 12.6 ± 6.0 | 15.0 ± 6.7 | 0.093 |
| Length of hospital stay before infection (days) (mean ± SD) | 0.1 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 2.5 | 0.042 |
| Duration of antibiotic treatment (days) (mean ± SD) | 11.2 ± 4.6 | 11.8 ± 3.7 | 0.365 |
| Overall mortality, n (%) | - | 1 (3) | 1.000 |
| Infection-related mortality, n (%) | - | 1 (3) | 1.000 |
| Antibiotic | Susceptible, n | Intermediate, n | Resistant, n | Total, n | Susceptibility Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vancomycin | 53 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 100.0 |
| Linezolid | 53 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 100.0 |
| Gentamicin | 53 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 100.0 |
| Teicoplanin | 48 | 0 | 5 | 53 | 90.6 |
| Tetracycline | 39 | 0 | 14 | 53 | 73.6 |
| Clindamycin | 39 | 0 | 14 | 53 | 73.6 |
| Ciprofloxacin/Levofloxacin | 32 | 18 | 3 | 53 | 60.4 |
| Benzylpenicillin | 5 | 0 | 48 | 53 | 9.4 |
DISCUSSION
S. aureus is recognized as a notable cause of invasive bacterial infections in neonates, particularly among those receiving care in NICUs (16-18). While its association with neonatal morbidity and mortality has been acknowledged, data regarding the clinical spectrum, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and risk factors for invasive diseaseparticularly in relation to methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillinsusceptible (MSSA) strains—remain limited in our settings (5,19). Through this retrospective case-control study, we sought to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by examining the demographic and clinical characteristics, resistance profiles, and outcomes of neonates with cultureconfirmed S. aureus sepsis. Over recent decades, MRSA infections have become increasingly prevalent globally, with resistance rates in neonatal cases exceeding 50% in many Asian countries. Colonization rates among the neonates in Asian settings have been reported between 3.9% and 8.4%, and approximately one in four colonized infants may develop invasive MRSA infection (5). In contrast, European surveillance data show significantly lower rates; for example, a NICU-based cohort study in Germany reported a 0.7% MRSA detection rate and a
0.1% BSI rate among neonates born at <29 weeks of gestation, with a 6.3% associated mortality (20). A meta-analysis from low- and middle-income countries estimated neonatal MRSA colonization at approximately 2.1%, although some African countries reported rates as high as 22.5%, reflecting substantial regional variation (21). In a recent ulticenter point-prevalence study involving 31 NICUs across Türkiye, S. aureus accounted for 18.9% of central line-associated BSIs (CLABSIs), with comparable proportions of MRSA and MSSA strains (8.1% and 10.8%, respectively), highlighting its persistent role in neonatal HAIs (22). This recent study from Türkiye did not include the southeastern region. In this context, the incidence rate of 0.76 S. aureus sepsis cases per 1.000 live births observed in our study provides a valuable contribution to the literature. This study highlights the clinical burden of S. aureus sepsis in neonates, with a particular emphasis on term and early term infants. Notably, over half of the infections were classified as EOS, which contrasts with the prevailing literature that predominantly associates S. aureus with LOS (17,19,23). The predominance of term infants, along with the high rate of CAIs, suggests that vertical or early postnatal transmission may be more significant than previously reported (3,17). A particularly concerning finding in our cohort was the high proportion of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections, accounting for 58.3% of MRSA cases. This finding reflects a shifting epidemiological trend that has been increasingly recognized worldwide. Traditionally, MRSA was regarded primarily as a healthcare-associated pathogen, but over the past two decades, CA-MRSA has emerged as a prominent cause of invasive infections in neonates, including those without typical hospital-associated risk factors. Studies from various geographic regions have reported a growing burden of CA-MRSA among otherwise healthy neonates presenting with skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia, pneumonia, and even osteoarticular involvement. For instance, Fortunov et al. observed that over two-thirds of S. aureus isolates in term and late preterm neonates with community-onset infections were methicillin-resistant, with a substantial proportion presenting within the first month of life (3). Similarly, recent surveillance studies in both high- and middle-income countries have demonstrated a steady rise in CA-MRSA prevalence, attributed to widespread community colonization and limited infection control outside healthcare settings (10,11,21,24). Importantly, these data underscore the necessity of considering empiric MRSA coverage, particularly in regions with known CA-MRSA circulation. The higher rates of septic shock and prolonged TPN use in MRSA cases, as well as the statistically significant difference in TPN duration between MRSA and MSSA groups, align with findings from Wu X et al., who also reported greater severity and nutritional impact in MRSA-infected neonates (5). These observations may indicate a more virulent clinical course for MRSA sepsis, necessitating early recognition and aggressive supportive care. Strikingly, skin manifestations were common among our cases, highlighting the skin as a potential early window into systemic S. aureus infection. In neonates, where clinical signs of sepsis may be subtle or nonspecific, the presence of characteristic cutaneous lesions can serve as a valuable diagnostic clue, prompting early suspicion and targeted antimicrobial therapy. This observation aligns with previous reports underscoring the importance of skin and soft tissue involvement in the clinical spectrum of neonatal S. aureus disease (17,19,25). Empiric antibiotic strategies for neonatal sepsis should ideally be aligned with local resistance patterns and organism prevalence. In our cohort, ampicillin-gentamicin was predominantly used for EOS, while vancomycin-gentamicin was common in LOS. However, all S. aureus isolates in his study demonstrated full resistance to penicillin, and a significant proportion were MRSA. These findings raise concerns regarding the adequacy of ampicillin-based empiric coverage, particularly in settings with high MRSA prevalence. Consistent with international recommendations, including those by McMullan et al. and Shadbolt et al., our data support the early inclusion of vancomycin in empiric therapy for neonates at risk for MRSA, especially in LOS or when clinical signs suggest skin and soft tissue involvement (4,17). Moreover, the high susceptibility rates to gentamicin and linezolid suggest these agents remain effective options, but teicoplanin resistance observed in nearly 10% of isolates warrants cautious use. Recent studies emphasize the growing global burden of MRSA in NICUs, particularly in preterm and low birth weight infants (19). In this context, traditional empiric regimens such as ampicillin and gentamicin may offer inadequate coverage in areas with high MRSA prevalence. Studies have underscored the necessity of early vancomycin use in empirical treatment, particularly in high-prevalence MRSA settings (26,27). Furthermore, MSSA remains a critical pathogen that can lead to significant morbidity, comparable to MRSA, and should not be overlooked in surveillance or prevention efforts. This study has several limitations. First, its retrospective design may have introduced bias related to incomplete documentation and inter-clinician variability in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Second, molecular characterization of S. aureus isolates-such as virulence factor profiling or strain typing-was not performed, limiting our understanding of potential pathogen-related ifferences in clinical presentation or outcomes between MRSA and MSSA cases. Third, the absence of detailed maternal data, including information on bacterial colonization, infectious disease history, and obstetric risk factors, precluded assessment of perinatal influences on neonatal infection risk, particularly in early-onset cases. In conclusion, this study contributes to the limited data on neonatal S. aureus sepsis by characterizing its clinical features, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and outcomes in our tertiary care setting. The predominance of MRSA, the high proportion of early-onset cases, and the considerable burden of CAIs suggest evolving epidemiological dynamics and the need to strengthen perinatal infection prevention strategies. The observed resistance profile raises concerns about the adequacy of standard empiric regimens, emphasizing the importance of context-specific antibiotic approaches. Despite its retrospective design, our findings highlight the critical role of surveillance, maternal risk assessment, and early recognition in improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.