ORIGINAL ARTICLES
VOLUME: 20
ISSUE: 1
P: 1-8#1-8
March 2026
Clinical Spectrum and Antimicrobial Resistance of Neonatal Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis: A Seven Year Case-Control Study
Journal of Pediatric Infection • 2026
DOI: 10.5578/ced.20260115
Received Date: 06.05.2025
Accepted Date: 24.09.2025
Publish Date: 17.03.2026
ABSTRACT
Objective
Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are a notable
cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Limited data exist regarding
the clinical spectrum and resistance profiles of neonatal S. aureus sepsis,
particularly in early-onset cases and those caused by methicillin-resistant strains. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics,
antimicrobial resistance patterns, and outcomes of culture-proven neonatal S. aureus sepsis.
Material and Methods
We conducted a retrospective, single-center,
case-control study in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit, including
neonates diagnosed with S. aureus sepsis between 1 January 2018 and
31 December 2024. Fifty-three neonates with culture-proven S. aureus
sepsis were compared to 106 matched controls without any documented
bloodstream infection (no growth in blood cultures). Demographic
characteristics, clinical features, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and
outcomes were analyzed. Subgroup comparisons were performed for
methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) vs. methicillin-susceptible S. aureus
(MSSA) and early-onset sepsis (EOS) vs. late-onset sepsis.
Results
Among the 53 S. aureus sepsis cases, 50.9% were classified as
EOS and 62.3% were due to MRSA. Community-acquired infections accounted for 90.6% of the cases, with MRSA responsible for the majority. Cutaneous manifestations were noted in 26.4% of the neonates.
MRSA-infected infants had significantly longer durations of total parenteral nutrition compared to MSSA cases (p= 0.048). All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid; 26.4% showed resistance to clindamycin and tetracycline. Septic shock developed in 49.1% of the cases,
and one infection-related deaths occurred (1.8%). An increasing trend in
MRSA prevalence was observed over the study period.
Conclusion
Neonatal S. aureus sepsis, particularly due to MRSA, remains
a serious clinical concern with considerable morbidity. The predominance of community-acquired infections and rising resistance highlight
the need for vigilant surveillance and optimized empirical treatment
strategies, especially in early-onset cases.
KEYWORDS
Neonatal, sepsis, antimicrobial resistance, MRSA, healthcare-associated infections
INTRODUCTION
Staphylococcus aureus is among the leading gram-positive
pathogens responsible for neonatal infections (1-5). In recent
decades, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections
have shown a rising trend globally, particularly in developing
countries, posing a growing challenge for neonatal care (6-
8). While MRSA has historically been associated with hospital
settings, recent epidemiological shifts have revealed a
concerning increase in community-acquired MRSA infections
(2,5-8).
Neonates are particularly vulnerable to S. aureus infections
due to immature skin and mucosal barriers, as well as the
frequent exposure to invasive medical interventions. While
skin and soft tissue infections are frequent presentations of
S. aureus in neonates, invasive conditions such as bacteremia,
pneumonia, osteomyelitis, myositis, empyema, meningitis,
and septic shock have been reported, often associated with
significant complications (9-11). Bloodstream infections (BSIs)
remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates
worldwide (1-4). These infections not only result in prolonged
hospitalization and increased healthcare costs but also
contribute to significant short- and long-term complications,
particularly among vulnerable newborns. S. aureus is among
the most frequently isolated pathogens in neonatal BSIs and
is implicated in both healthcare-associated infections (HAIs)
and community-acquired infections (CAIs) (3, 10,11).
Neonatal sepsis has been widely studied; however, data
regarding the clinical spectrum, microbiologic features,
and outcomes of S. aureus BSIs in neonates remain limited.
Identifying the causative pathogen in this population is
particularly challenging due to the nonspecific clinical
presentation and the low yield of blood cultures. Consequently,
studies based on culture-proven infections are of great clinical
and epidemiological relevance. Therefore, this study aimed
to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics,
antimicrobial resistance patterns, and treatment outcomes of
neonates diagnosed with S. aureus sepsis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cengiz Gökçek Women’s and Children’s Hospital is a tertiary
public hospital specializing in obstetrics, gynecology, and
pediatrics. It serves as a regional referral center in southeastern
Türkiye, with approximately 10.000 deliveries per year and 650
annual admissions to its 80-bed neonatal intensive care units,
including a 45-bed tertiary unit.
Study Design and Population
We conducted a retrospective study of newborns
diagnosed with S. aureus BSIs in the neonatal intensive care
unit (NICU) of Cengiz Gökçek Women’s and Children’s Hospital
Hospital, Gaziantep, Türkiye, between 1 January 2018 and 31
December 2024.
Infants with culture-proven S. aureus sepsis were identified
through routinely collected electronic health records.
Demographic data-including gestational age, birth weight,
sex, and clinical outcomes-were extracted. Clinical parameters
such as presenting symptoms, associated complications,
duration of invasive line use, antibiotic regimens, and treatment
durations were also collected. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles
and resistance patterns of S. aureus isolates were documented.
Each case was classified as either CAI or HAI. Microbiological
data were retrieved from the hospital’s electronic database.
If multiple cultures tested positive for S. aureus during
hospitalization, only the first isolate was included to avoid
duplication.
Neonates who met the clinical criteria for sepsis, had a
positive blood culture for S. aureus, and received ongoing
treatment in the NICU were included. Patients who were
transferred to another facility or had incomplete or unavailable
medical records were excluded.
This study was approved by the Gaziantep University
Ethics Committee (Approval no: 2025/63).
Definitions
Neonatal sepsis was defined as a clinical syndrome
characterized by systemic signs of infection occurring within the first 30 days of life (12). Based on the timing of onset, cases
were classified as either early-onset sepsis (EOS), defined as
sepsis occurring within the first 72 hours of life, or late-onset
sepsis (LOS), defined as sepsis occurring between day 4 and
day 30 of life (12). An infection was considered communityacquired if the organism was detected within 48 hours of
admission, during outpatient care, or later than 48 hours
if symptoms were already present at the time of admission.
Hospital-acquired infections are infections that occur 48
hours or more after hospital admission, were not present or
incubating at the time of admission (13-15).
Control neonates, free from infection, were chosen from
the same NICU as the case patients. Their selection involved
matching by admission period (initially within a ±30-day
window, extendable by an additional ±30 days if fewer than
two controls were available), absence of S. aureus growth from
sterile sites, and concordance in gestational week and birth
weight. The aim was to secure a minimum of two controls per
case.
Microbiological analysis
S. aureus isolates were identified using standard
microbiological methods and confirmed by matrix-assisted
laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
(MALDI-TOF MS). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was
performed using the VITEK® 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcyl’Étoile, France). Methicillin resistance was determined based
on oxacillin and cefoxitin susceptibility, and isolates were
classified as MRSA or MSSA accordingly. Susceptibility to
antibiotics including clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin,
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, vancomycin,
linezolid, and teicoplanin was interpreted in accordance with
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.
Statistics
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software,
version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics
were used to summarize the baseline characteristics of the
study population. Means with minimum-maximum values
or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) were reported
for continuous variables, while frequencies and percentages
were provided for categorical variables. Categorical variables
were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact
test, as appropriate. The distribution of continuous variables
was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For group
comparisons, the independent samples t-test was used for
normally distributed data, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test
or Kruskal-Wallis test was applied for non-normally distributed
data. To estimate the strength of associations, odds ratios
(ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated
for both dichotomized continuous and categorical variables.
In addition, univariate and multivariate logistic regression
analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors.
A two-tailed p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically
significant. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were
performed to identify factors associated with MRSA versus
MSSA infection, as well as to compare neonates with S. aureus
sepsis and uninfected controls.
RESULTS
A total of 53 neonates with S. aureus sepsis and 106
matched uninfected controls (matched at a 1:2 ratio) were
included in the final analysis, resulting in a study cohort of 159
infants. As presented in Table 1, demographic characteristics
were comparable between the two groups. During the sevenyear study period, 53 neonates were diagnosed with S. aureus
BSI. Given the approximately 10.000 live births per year at our
center, this corresponds to an estimated annual incidence of
0.76 S. aureus sepsis cases per 1.000 live births.
Mean gestational age was 38 weeks (min-max; 34-41) in
the S. aureus group. A total of 86.8% (46/53) of S. aureus sepsis
episodes occurred in term infants (≥37 weeks’ gestation),
with the majority of cases seen in those born early term (37-
38+6 weeks), accounting for 50.9% (27/53). In the S. aureus
group, comorbidities were identified in 13 (24.5%) neonates.
These were including congenital heart disease (n= 4; one with
prior valvuloplasty), Rh incompatibility requiring exchange
transfusion (n= 3), cephalhematoma (n= 1), operated anal atresia (n= 1), duodenal atresia (n= 1), complicated delivery
with clavicular fracture (n= 1), and neonatal seizures (n= 2).
Compared to the controls, the neonates with S. aureus sepsis
had a significantly longer length of hospital stay prior to
infection (OR: 12.09, 95% CI: 2.54-57.5; p= 0.0002) (Table 2). The
need for mechanical ventilation was lower in the SA group.
Cutaneous manifestations indicative of impaired skin
integrity were identified in 14 (26.4%) neonates within the S.
aureus sepsis group. These included cellulitis (n= 6), bullous
lesions (n= 2), pustular eruptions (n= 3), and omphalitis
(n= 2). One case exhibited localized infection at a thoracic
tube insertion site. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome
was diagnosed in two infants. Additionally, concomitant
pneumonia was observed in three cases. Vegetation was
not detected on echocardiography in any of the patients.
No abscess formation was observed on transfontanelle or
abdominal ultrasonography.
Based on the timing of symptom onset, 50.9% (n= 27) of
S. aureus cases were classified as EOS, and 49.1% (n= 26) as
LOS. Vaginal delivery was more common in both EOS (55.6%,
n= 15) and LOS (61.5%, n= 16) groups, compared to cesarean
section (44.4%, n= 12 and 38.5%, n= 10, respectively).
While term birth predominated in both groups, preterm
birth occurred more frequently among neonates with EOS
compared to those with LOS (18.5% vs. 7.6%, respectively) (p=
0.63); all preterm births were classified as late preterm (34-
36+6 weeks of gestation). Median gestational age at birth was
38 weeks in both groups (p= 0.499).
Median birth weight was 3000 grams (IQR: 550) in the
EOS group and 3100 grams (IQR: 500) in the LOS group (p=
0.799). The median age at onset of LOS was seven days (range:
3-19; IQR: 9). Median length of hospital stay was significantly
longer in the LOS group compared to the EOS group [15 days
(IQR: 10) vs. 10 days (IQR: 4); p= 0.004]. Antibiotic treatment
duration was also significantly prolonged in LOS cases, with a
mean of 14 days (min-max: 7-28) versus nine days (min-max:
7-21) in the EOS group (p= 0.018).
Among the infants with S. aureus sepsis, 62.3% (n= 33)
were infected with MRSA, while 37.7% (n= 20) had MSSA
(Table 3). When classified by acquisition setting, 96% (n= 48)
of the cases were CA, whereas 9.4% (n= 5) were HA; notably, all
HAIs were due to MRSA. Of the CA S. aureus cases, more than
half (58.3%) were caused by MRSA.
Maternal and neonatal colonization was detected in 3.7%
(n= 2) of the neonates. MRSA was isolated from maternal nasal
swabs, while MRSA was detected in tracheal aspirate cultures
of the corresponding neonates. In two neonates with bullous
skin lesions, MSSA was isolated from both blood cultures and
the fluid aspirated from the bullae.
Septic shock requiring inotropic support was present in
49.1% (n= 26) of the neonates with S. aureus sepsis, with a
higher frequency among MRSA cases compared to MSSA, but
it was not statistically significant (54.5% vs. 40.0%, p= 0.22).
Mechanical ventilation was administered to 14 neonates,
and 15.1% required endotracheal intubation (Table 3). An
umbilical venous catheter was present in 43 neonates (81.1%).
This included 15 (75%) in the MSSA group and 28 (84%) in the
MRSA group (p= 0.37). A total of 43.5% of the patients (24/53)
required total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Of these, 5 (25%) were
in the MSSA group and 19 (57.6%) were in the MRSA group.
The difference between the groups was statistically significant
(p= 0.021). The mean duration of TPN was significantly longer
in the MRSA group (6.7 days; min-max: 0-23) than in the MSSA
group (3.15 days; min-max: 0-14) (p= 0.048). A multivariate
logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors
associated with MSSA versus MRSA infection, incorporating
variables such as septic shock, mechanical ventilation,
umbilical venous catheterization, and TPN use. None of these
variables were independently associated with the type of S.
aureus infection. A similar analysis comparing neonates with
S. aureus sepsis and uninfected controls was also conducted,
which likewise did not reveal any statistically significant
associations.
Among 53 S. aureus isolates tested, all were fully
susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, and gentamicin (Table 4).
Teicoplanin susceptibility was 90.6%, with resistance detected
in five isolates. Fluoroquinolone susceptibility (ciprofloxacin/
levofloxacin) was 60.4%, with 18 isolates showing intermediate
susceptibility and three classified as resistant. Resistance
to tetracycline and clindamycin was observed in 14 isolates
each, corresponding to a susceptibility rate of 73.6% for both
agents. Only five isolates were susceptible to benzylpenicillin.
Temporal distribution of S. aureus cases was evaluated
in four-month intervals (Figure 1). The highest number of
isolates was recorded in early 2019, followed by a fluctuating
pattern with an overall decreasing trend toward 2024. MSSA
was more frequently identified across most periods, whereas
MRSA showed greater variability. A gradual increase in the
proportion of MRSA among S. aureus isolates was observed
over time.
Overall mortality in the S. aureus sepsis group was 3.7%
(2/53). One of the deceased neonates had hypoplastic left
heart syndrome with hemodynamic instability, while the
other was a 34-week gestational age infant with EOS and
documented S. aureus colonization in both the mother and
the infant. The latter died due to septic shock on the fourth
day of hospitalization. Infection-related mortality was 1.8%.
DISCUSSION
S. aureus is recognized as a notable cause of invasive
bacterial infections in neonates, particularly among those
receiving care in NICUs (16-18). While its association with
neonatal morbidity and mortality has been acknowledged,
data regarding the clinical spectrum, antimicrobial resistance
patterns, and risk factors for invasive disease—particularly
in relation to methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillinsusceptible (MSSA) strains—remain limited in our settings
(5,19). Through this retrospective case-control study, we
sought to contribute to the existing body of knowledge
by examining the demographic and clinical characteristics,
resistance profiles, and outcomes of neonates with cultureconfirmed S. aureus sepsis.
Over recent decades, MRSA infections have become
increasingly prevalent globally, with resistance rates in
neonatal cases exceeding 50% in many Asian countries.
Colonization rates among the neonates in Asian settings have
been reported between 3.9% and 8.4%, and approximately
one in four colonized infants may develop invasive MRSA
infection (5). In contrast, European surveillance data show
significantly lower rates; for example, a NICU-based cohort
study in Germany reported a 0.7% MRSA detection rate and a 0.1% BSI rate among neonates born at <29 weeks of gestation,
with a 6.3% associated mortality (20). A meta-analysis from
low- and middle-income countries estimated neonatal
MRSA colonization at approximately 2.1%, although some
African countries reported rates as high as 22.5%, reflecting
substantial regional variation (21). In a recent multicenter
point-prevalence study involving 31 NICUs across Türkiye,
S. aureus accounted for 18.9% of central line-associated
BSIs (CLABSIs), with comparable proportions of MRSA and
MSSA strains (8.1% and 10.8%, respectively), highlighting
its persistent role in neonatal HAIs (22). This recent study
from Türkiye did not include the southeastern region. In this
context, the incidence rate of 0.76 S. aureus sepsis cases per
1.000 live births observed in our study provides a valuable
contribution to the literature.
This study highlights the clinical burden of S. aureus
sepsis in neonates, with a particular emphasis on term and
early term infants. Notably, over half of the infections were
classified as EOS, which contrasts with the prevailing literature
that predominantly associates S. aureus with LOS (17,19,23).
The predominance of term infants, along with the high rate
of CAIs, suggests that vertical or early postnatal transmission
may be more significant than previously reported (3,17).
A particularly concerning finding in our cohort was the
high proportion of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA)
infections, accounting for 58.3% of MRSA cases. This finding
reflects a shifting epidemiological trend that has been
increasingly recognized worldwide. Traditionally, MRSA was
regarded primarily as a healthcare-associated pathogen,
but over the past two decades, CA-MRSA has emerged as a
prominent cause of invasive infections in neonates, including
those without typical hospital-associated risk factors. Studies
from various geographic regions have reported a growing
burden of CA-MRSA among otherwise healthy neonates
presenting with skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia,
pneumonia, and even osteoarticular involvement. For
instance, Fortunov et al. observed that over two-thirds of
S. aureus isolates in term and late preterm neonates with
community-onset infections were methicillin-resistant, with
a substantial proportion presenting within the first month of
life (3). Similarly, recent surveillance studies in both high- and
middle-income countries have demonstrated a steady rise in
CA-MRSA prevalence, attributed to widespread community
colonization and limited infection control outside healthcare
settings (10,11,21,24). Importantly, these data underscore the
necessity of considering empiric MRSA coverage, particularly
in regions with known CA-MRSA circulation.
The higher rates of septic shock and prolonged TPN use in
MRSA cases, as well as the statistically significant difference
in TPN duration between MRSA and MSSA groups, align with
findings from Wu X et al., who also reported greater severity
and nutritional impact in MRSA-infected neonates (5). These
observations may indicate a more virulent clinical course for
MRSA sepsis, necessitating early recognition and aggressive
supportive care.
Strikingly, skin manifestations were common among
our cases, highlighting the skin as a potential early window
into systemic S. aureus infection. In neonates, where clinical
signs of sepsis may be subtle or nonspecific, the presence
of characteristic cutaneous lesions can serve as a valuable diagnostic clue, prompting early suspicion and targeted
antimicrobial therapy. This observation aligns with previous
reports underscoring the importance of skin and soft tissue
involvement in the clinical spectrum of neonatal S. aureus
disease (17,19,25).
Empiric antibiotic strategies for neonatal sepsis should
ideally be aligned with local resistance patterns and organism
prevalence. In our cohort, ampicillin-gentamicin was
predominantly used for EOS, while vancomycin-gentamicin
was common in LOS. However, all S. aureus isolates in this study
demonstrated full resistance to penicillin, and a significant
proportion were MRSA. These findings raise concerns
regarding the adequacy of ampicillin-based empiric coverage,
particularly in settings with high MRSA prevalence. Consistent
with international recommendations, including those by
McMullan et al. and Shadbolt et al., our data support the early
inclusion of vancomycin in empiric therapy for neonates at
risk for MRSA, especially in LOS or when clinical signs suggest
skin and soft tissue involvement (4,17). Moreover, the high
susceptibility rates to gentamicin and linezolid suggest these
agents remain effective options, but teicoplanin resistance
observed in nearly 10% of isolates warrants cautious use.
Recent studies emphasize the growing global burden of
MRSA in NICUs, particularly in preterm and low birth weight
infants (19). In this context, traditional empiric regimens such
as ampicillin and gentamicin may offer inadequate coverage
in areas with high MRSA prevalence. Studies have underscored
the necessity of early vancomycin use in empirical treatment,
particularly in high-prevalence MRSA settings (26,27).
Furthermore, MSSA remains a critical pathogen that can lead
to significant morbidity, comparable to MRSA, and should not
be overlooked in surveillance or prevention efforts.
This study has several limitations. First, its retrospective
design may have introduced bias related to incomplete
documentation and inter-clinician variability in diagnostic and
therapeutic approaches. Second, molecular characterization
of S. aureus isolates-such as virulence factor profiling or strain
typing-was not performed, limiting our understanding of
potential pathogen-related differences in clinical presentation
or outcomes between MRSA and MSSA cases. Third, the
absence of detailed maternal data, including information on
bacterial colonization, infectious disease history, and obstetric
risk factors, precluded assessment of perinatal influences on
neonatal infection risk, particularly in early-onset cases.
In conclusion, this study contributes to the limited data
on neonatal S. aureus sepsis by characterizing its clinical
features, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and outcomes in
our tertiary care setting. The predominance of MRSA, the high
proportion of early-onset cases, and the considerable burden
of CAIs suggest evolving epidemiological dynamics and the
need to strengthen perinatal infection prevention strategies.
The observed resistance profile raises concerns about the
adequacy of standard empiric regimens, emphasizing the
importance of context-specific antibiotic approaches. Despite
its retrospective design, our findings highlight the critical role
of surveillance, maternal risk assessment, and early recognition
in improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.
REFERENCES
1
Shane AL, Sánchez PJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet
2017;390(10104):1770-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-
6736(17)31002-4
2
Dong Y, Glaser K, Speer CP. New threats from an old foe: Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in neonates. Neonatology
2018;114(2):127-34. https://doi.org/10.1159/000488582
3
Mustapha SS, Zaidu MA, Yusuf MS, Aliyu S, Abdulkadir I. Methicillin
resistant staphylococcus aureus infection in neonates- a major concern and a call for action. Niger Med J 2024;65(4):503-11. https://doi.
org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4330640/v1
4
Tuzun F, Ozkan H, Cetinkaya M, Yucesoy E, Kurum O, Cebeci B, et
al. Is European Medicines Agency (EMA) sepsis criteria accurate for
neonatal sepsis diagnosis or do we need new criteria? PLoS One
2019;14(6):e0218002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218002
5
Mun SJ, Kim SH, Kim HT, Moon C, Wi YM. The epidemiology of bloodstream infection contributing to mortality: the difference between
community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and hospital-acquired
infections. BMC Infect Dis 2022;22(1):336. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12879-022-07267-9
6
Smith H, Watkins J, Otis M, Hebden JN, Wright MO. Health care-associated infections studies project: An American journal of infection control and national healthcare safety network data quality collaboration
case study - Chapter 2 Identifying Healthcare-associated Infections
(HAI) for NHSN Surveillance case study vignettes. Am J Infect Control
2022;50(6):695-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.02.028
7
Friedman ND, Kaye KS, Stout JE, McGarry SA, Trivette SL, Briggs JP, et al.
Health care--associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to
change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann
Intern Med 2002;137(10):791-7. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-
137-10-200211190-00007
8
Obeng JA, Akanwariwiak WG, Adade E, Sylverken AA. Infection of
neonates with Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus at Dormaa Presbyterian Hospital, Ghana.
Microbiol Spectr 2025;13(6):e0174924. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01749-24
9
Shadbolt R, We MLS, Kohan R, Porter M, Athalye-Jape G, Nathan E, et
al. Neonatal Staphylococcus aureus sepsis: a 20-year Western Australian experience. J Perinatol 2022;42:1440-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41372-022-01440-3
10
Nishihara Y, Zaniletti I, Zenge J, Weikel B, Parker S, Murthy K, et al. Epidemiology of bacterial and fungal infections among level IV neonatal
units in North America. J Perinatol 2025;45(7):997-1004. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41372-025-02337-7
11
Washam M, Woltmann J, Haberman B, Haslam D, Staat MA. Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in the
neonatal intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Am J Infect Control 2017;45(12):1388-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ajic.2017.06.021
12
Shane AL, Sánchez PJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet
2017;390(10104):1770-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-
6736(17)31002-4
13
Böhne C, Knegendorf L, Schwab F, Ebadi E, Bange FC, Vital M, et al. Epidemiology and infection control of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a German tertiary neonatal intensive and intermediate
care unit: A retrospective study (2013-2020). PLoS ONE 17(9):e0275087.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275087
14
Beaumont A, Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Breurec S, Huynh B. Neonatal
colonization with antibiotic-resistant pathogens in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA
Netw Open 2024;7(11):e2441596. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41596
15
Bedir Demirdağ T, Koç E, Tezer H, Oğuz S, Satar M, Sağlam Ö, et al. The
prevalence and diagnostic criteria of health-care associated infections in neonatal intensive care units in Turkey: A multicenter pointprevalence study. Pediatr Neonatol 2021;62(2):208-17. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2021.01.001
16
Johnson AP, Sharland M, Goodall CM, Blackburn R, Kearns AM, Gilbert
R, et al. Enhanced surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia in children in the UK and Ireland. Arch Dis
Child 2010;95(10):781-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.162537
17
David MZ, Daum RS. Community-associated methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an
emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010;23(3):616-87. https://doi.
org/10.1128/CMR.00081-09
18
De Rose DU, Pugnaloni F, Martini L, Bersani I, Ronchetti MP, Diociaiuti A,
et al. Staphylococcal infections and neonatal skin: Data from literature
and suggestions for the clinical management from four challenging
patients. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023;12(4):632. https://doi.org/10.3390/
antibiotics12040632
19
Procianoy RS, Silveira RC. The challenges of neonatal sepsis management. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2020;96(1):80-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jped.2019.10.004
20
Kariniotaki C, Thomou C, Gkentzi D, Panteris E, Dimitriou G, Hatzidaki E. Neonatal sepsis: A comprehensive review. Antibiotics
21
Fortunov RM, Hulten KG, Hammerman WA, Mason EO Jr, Kaplan SL.
Community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infections in term and
near-term previously healthy neonates. Pediatrics 2006;118(3):874-81.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0884
22
McMullan BJ, Campbell AJ, Blyth CC, McNeil JC, Montgomery CP, Tong
SYC, et al. Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in
neonates, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 2020;146(3):e20200134.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0134
23
Wu X, Wang C, He L, Xu H, Jing C, Chen Y, et al. Clinical characteristics
and antibiotic resistance profile of invasive MRSA infections in newborn
inpatients: a retrospective multicenter study from China. BMC Pediatr
2023;23(1):264. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04084-0
24
Zervou FN, Zacharioudakis IM, Ziakas PD, Mylonakis E. MRSA colonization and risk of infection in the neonatal and pediatric ICU: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2014;133(4):e1015-23. https://doi.org/10.1542/
peds.2013-3413
25
Esemu SN, Bowo-Ngandji A, Ndip RN, Akoachere JTK, Keneh NK, Ebogo-Belobo JT, et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in neonates within neonatal intensive
care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Infect Dis
2024;16(4):160-82. https://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_95_24
26
Zamani S, Dadashi M, Bahonar S, Haghighi M, Kakavandi S, Hashemi
A, et al. Emerging challenges in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream
infections: insights from coagulase typing, toxin genes, and antibiotic resistance patterns. Adv Med 2023;2023:7041159. https://doi.
org/10.1155/2023/7041159
27
Rallis D, Atzemoglou N, Kapetaniou K, Giaprou LE, Baltogianni M, Giapros V. Molecular epidemiology clinical manifestations, decolonization
strategies, and treatment options of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infection in neonates. Pathogens 2025;14(2):155. https://
doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14020155