ORIGINAL ARTICLES
VOLUME: 20
ISSUE: 1
P: 9-18#9-18
March 2026
Evaluation of Blood Culture Positivity, Acute Phase Reactants and Brucella Capture Titer in Pediatric Brucellosis: Single Center Seven Year Experience
Journal of Pediatric Infection • 2026
DOI: 10.5578/ced.20260116
Received Date: 08.05.2025
Accepted Date: 03.07.2025
Publish Date: 17.03.2026
ABSTRACT
Objective
Brucellosis is one of the most common zoonotic diseases in
the world. This study evaluated the characteristics of brucellosis in childhood.
Material and Methods
The study included 103 patients diagnosed
with brucellosis. Patient data were obtained retrospectively from the
hospital’s digital system and files.
Results
Mean age of the patients was 11.26 ± 4.705 years. The most
common presenting complaints were arthralgia (88.3%), fever (65%) and
fatigue (65%). There was a positive family history of brucellosis in 36.9%
of the patients and a history of animal husbandry in 48.5%. Growth was
observed in 37.7% of the 53 patients with blood culture samples. The
highest number of admissions occurred during spring (37.8%), while the
fewest admissions took place in winter (11.6%). Anemia was detected in
38 (36.9%) patients, neutropenia in 11 (10.7%), thrombocytopenia in 9
(8.7%), and pancytopenia was detected in 4 (3.9%) patients. Mean value of the Brucella capture test was significantly higher in patients with
elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and with organomegaly on abdominal ultrasonography (p< 0.05). It was observed that the presence
of growth in blood culture was statistically significant in cases of low
platelet count (p< 0.05). Correlation analysis was performed between
all parameters. When evaluated with advanced regression analysis,
it was found that there was a negative correlation between patients
with growth in blood culture and CRP levels and platelet count and a positive correlation between CRP levels and creatinine levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p< 0.05).
Conclusion
Our study suggests that while Brucella titer and erythrocyte
sedimentation rate may not directly correlate with systemic involvement
and the development of disease complications, CRP levels could serve
as a potential predictor for systemic involvement and the development
of complications in pediatric brucellosis. These findings could have significant implications for the diagnosis and management of brucellosis
in children, potentially leading to earlier intervention and improved outcomes.
KEYWORDS
Brucella, brucella capture titer, CRP, blood culture
INTRODUCTION
Brucellosis is one of the most common zoonotic diseases
worldwide (1). It is particularly prevalent in Mediterranean
countries, India, the Middle East, and Central/South America.
Approximately 500.000 cases are reported worldwide each
year, and it is estimated that 2.4 billion people are at risk (1,2).
The prevalence of brucellosis is increasing due to heightened
international tourism, trade, and migration. The main routes
of transmission include the consumption of unpasteurized
contaminated milk and dairy products, contact of the skin
or mucous membranes with infected animal tissue (such
as placenta or abortion products) or fluids (such as blood,
urine, or milk) from infected animals, inhalation of infected
aerosols, or inoculation into the conjunctiva (3). Brucellosis
is a disease that can affect multiple organs and systems,
including the heart, gastrointestinal system, central nervous
system, genitourinary system, hematopoietic system, and
particularly, the osteoarticular system (4). It typically presents
with an insidious onset of fever, night sweats, fatigue, and
arthralgia. Other symptoms may include weight loss, back
pain, headache, dizziness, anorexia, dyspepsia, abdominal
pain, cough, and depression. Physical examination is variable
and nonspecific; hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and/or
lymphadenopathy may be observed. Since the complaints,
symptoms, and physical examination findings are not specific
to the disease, obtaining a thorough history is crucial for
diagnosis (4). Delays in diagnosis and treatment can lead to
increased morbidity and mortality (5). The definitive diagnosis
of brucellosis can be established by culturing the organism
(from blood, body fluids, or tissues) or by a ≥4-fold increase in
Brucella antibody titer between acute and convalescent serum
samples taken ≥2 weeks apart (6,7). A presumptive diagnosis
can be made by an antibody titer of ≥1:160 measured using
the standard tube agglutination test or by detecting Brucella
DNA in a clinical sample via polymerase chain reaction.
Brucellosis treatment aims to control the disease and prevent
complications, relapses, sequelae, and mortality (6,7). This
retrospective study aimed to examine the demographic and
epidemiological characteristics of the patients, acute phase
reactants, serological tests, biochemical and hematological
parameters, culture results, and radiological findings, as well
as to determine whether there was an association between
Brucella capture titer, acute phase reactants, and the presence
of growth in blood cultures and other parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study included 103 patients aged 1 month to 18
years who were diagnosed with acute brucellosis and who
applied to Dicle University Faculty of Medicine Children’s
Health and Diseases Hospital as outpatients between January
1, 2016 and March 31, 2023. Brucellosis diagnosis was based
on a comprehensive set of criteria including clinical findings,
isolation of Brucella microorganisms from blood and/or
Brucella capture agglutination titer >1/160.
Demographic characteristics of the patients, presenting
complaints, complete blood counts, biochemical tests, blood
culture results, serological laboratory data, radiological
imaging findings, and administered treatments were obtained
retrospectively from the hospital’s digital system and the
medical files of the patients. Patients with brucellosis from
whom sufficient data could not be obtained were excluded
from the study.
Biochemical parameters were evaluated using the
Olympus AU5800 Beckman Coulter device.
Approximately 2 mL of blood was collected into an EDTA
hemogram tube and evaluated using the Sysmex XN 1000
Hematology Analyzer for complete blood counts.
C-reactive protein (CRP) was evaluated using the
nephelometric method on the olympus AU5800 Beckman
Coulter device. The reference range for CRP levels was 0-5
mg/L, with values >5 considered elevated.
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was evaluated using
the Grenier Sed Rate SCR Vision device. The reference range
for ESR was 0-20 mm/h, and values >20 were considered
elevated.
Blood cultures were collected upon admission to the
hospital before initiating brucellosis treatment. Blood samples
collected into BACTEC blood culture bottles were examined
using the BD BACTEC FX automated blood culture device for at
least seven days and monitored for Brucella spp. growth. Blood
cultures were taken from patients who showed prolonged fever, systemic symptoms, or suspected bacteremia. In our hospital,
blood culture samples can only be taken from patients who are
being followed up as inpatients. Therefore, blood cultures could
not be taken from patients who applied to the outpatient clinic
and continued their diagnosis and treatment as outpatients.
Complete blood count parameters of the patients, including
hemoglobin (Hb), leukocyte count (WBC), and platelet count,
were evaluated while considering the age of the patients. An
Hb value of two SD or below was considered indicative of
anemia. WBC values below the lower limit according to age
were considered leukopenia, while those above the upper
limit were considered leukocytosis (8). Platelet values below
150.000/mm³ were classified as thrombocytopenia. Cases with
WBC, Hb level, and platelet count values below the normal
range for age were classified as pancytopenia; cases with two
out of three of these values below the lower limit for age were
classified as bi-cytopenia; neutrophil values below the lower
limit for age were classified as neutropenia, and lymphocyte/
monocyte values above the upper limit for age were classified
as lymphomonocytosis.
In cases where the liver and/or spleen were above the upper
age limit on abdominal ultrasound (USG), cases of enlarged
liver only were classified as hepatomegaly, enlarged spleen
only were classified as splenomegaly, and both enlarged liver
and spleen were classified as hepatosplenomegaly (9).
Systemic involvement was determined according to
hepatosplenomegaly, sacroiliitis, endocardial involvement (on
echocardiography), changes in complete blood parameters
and liver enzymes.
Ethical Considerations
Approval for the study was obtained from the Dicle
University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (Date:
17.05.2023, Number: 22).
Statistical Analysis
Study data were analyzed using SPSS 22. Fisher’s exact test,
Pearson’s chi-squared test, Pearson correlation, multiple linear
regression, T-test (for independent samples), and One-Way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for data comparison.
Categorical data were expressed as frequency and percentage,
while continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard
deviation and min-max values. In the analyses, a p-value of
<0.05 was considered statistically significant, and a p-value of
>0.05 was considered statistically insignificant.
RESULTS
Mean age of the patients was 11.26 ± 4.705 years (min:
2, max: 18 years). Of these, 43 (41.7%) were female and 60
(58.3%) were male. Geographical distribution revealed that
73 (70.8%) were from the Southeastern Anatolia Region, and
30 (29.2%) were from the Eastern Anatolia Region. Forty-six
(44.7%) patients resided in the city center, while 57 (55.3%)
lived in rural areas. A family history of brucellosis was reported
in 38 (36.9%) patients, and 50 (48.5%) patients had a family
history of animal husbandry (Table 1).
Regarding the timing of hospital admissions, it was found
that admissions occurred most frequently in march (13.5%),
april (13.5%), may (10.6%), and august (10.6%). The highest
number of admissions occurred during spring (37.8%), while
the fewest admissions took place in winter (11.6%) (Table 1).
The most common complaints among the patients were as
follows: Arthralgia in 91 (88.3%) patients, fever in 67 (65%),
and fatigue in 67 (65%). Rare symptoms included scrotal pain
in one patient and nosebleeds in two patients (Table 1). On
admission, Brucella capture titers were found to be 1/5120 in 47 (45.7%) patients, 1/2560 in 17 (16.5%) patients, 1/1280 in
13 (12%) patients, 1/640 in 16 (15.5%) patients, and 1/320 in 7
(6.8%) patients. Only three (2.9%) patients had a titer of 1/160
on admission.
Laboratory parameters of the patients included in
the study are shown in Table 2. In evaluating laboratory
parameters according to age range and reference values,
anemia was detected in 38 (36.9%) patients, neutropenia in 11 (10.7%) patients, thrombocytopenia in 9 (8.7%) patients, and
pancytopenia was detected in 4 (3.9%) patients. Additionally,
elevated CRP levels were detected in 68.6% (n= 70) of the
patients, and an increase in the ESR was found in 58.3% (n=
42/72) of the patients, with abnormalities in at least one liver
function test (transaminase) detected in 27 (26.7%) patients.
Blood culture samples were obtained from 53 patients, and
growth was detected in 20 (37.7%) of these patients, with
Brucella melitensis identified in all positive cultures.
In examining patients for radiological findings,
hepatosplenomegaly was found on abdominal USG in 17
(16.5%) patients. Hepatomegaly alone was observed in 6 (5.8%)
patients, while splenomegaly was noted in 5 (4.8%) patients.
No endocarditis, myocarditis or serious cardiac complications
were detected in any of the patients in echocardiographic
(ECHO) evaluations. Mild mitral regurgitation was seen in
seven patients and mild aortic regurgitation in one patient.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to detect
sacroiliitis, and findings indicating sacroiliitis were observed
in 8 (7.7%) patients.
In evaluating the relationship between growth status
in blood culture and complete blood count, acute phase
reactants, and biochemical parameters, the platelet count in
patients with detected growth in blood culture was statistically
significantly lower than that in patients without growth
(198.25 ± 81.74 vs. 272.90 ± 101.33; p< 0.05). No significant
differences were found in terms of other parameters.
Comparing blood culture results with other nonparametric
values, a statistically significant result was found between the
presence of growth in blood culture and organomegaly (p<
0.05). No significant relationships were identified between
anemia, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, elevated acute
phase reactants (CRP, ESR), elevated transaminase levels,
ECHO, and MRI findings.
In examining the relationship between nonparametric
laboratory and imaging results and Brucella capture titer,
it was found that the Brucella capture titer was significantly
higher in patients with elevated CRP and organomegaly
detected on abdominal USG (p< 0.05). Additionally, no
statistically significant differences were observed between
thrombocytopenia, elevated ESR, elevated transaminase
levels, growth in blood culture, sacroiliitis, and Brucella capture
titer (p> 0.05) (Table 2). In evaluating the correlation between
Brucella capture titers and the results of complete blood
counts and biochemical laboratory tests, a positive correlation
was found between Brucella capture titers and levels of alanine
aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST),
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and red cell distribution width.
Conversely, a negative correlation was observed between
Brucella capture titer and neutrophil count, albumin, and
total bilirubin (p< 0.05). When a linear regression analysis was
performed for the significant results obtained in the Pearson
correlation analysis, no significant correlation among these
parameters was established (p> 0.05) (Table 3). According
to the ANOVA test results (F= 0.371; p> 0.05), there were no
significant differences between the Brucella capture value
and hematological findings (pancytopenia/bi-cytopenia/
neutropenia).
In examining the correlation between patient (ESR) values
and other laboratory parameters, a negative correlation was
found between ESR and red blood cell count, Hb, hematocrit,
and albumin. In contrast, a positive correlation was noted
between ESR and CRP (p< 0.05). In advanced regression
analysis performed for the five parameters correlated with ESR,
only the positive correlation CRP was found to be significant
(p< 0.05) (Table 4).
When examining the correlation between the patient’s CRP
values and other laboratory parameters, a negative correlation
was observed between CRP values and albumin and platelet
count. In contrast, a positive correlation was found between
CRP values and creatinine, ESR, Brucella capture titer, AST, and
urea (p< 0.05) (Table 5). A linear regression analysis for these
results indicated a positive correlation between CRP values
and creatinine and ESR (p< 0.05) and a negative correlation
between CRP values and platelet count (p< 0.05) (Table 5).
DISCUSSION
Brucellosis is the most common zoonotic disease in the
world. It is a significant public health problem in developing
countries, including ours. Brucellosis can affect any individual,
regardless of sex and can occur at any age, depending on
exposure. Given that it is a zoonotic disease, the occupation
of animal husbandry is a critical risk factor for this condition.
Among the studies conducted on brucellosis in children,
mean age of the patients was 7.75 ± 3.28 years in the study
by Salman et al., where 69.6% of the participants were male
and 30.4% were female. In the study by Özdem et al., where
61.4% of the patients were male, and 38.6% were female, the
mean age was found to be 10.4 years, with 6% of the patients’
families engaged in animal husbandry and 37% having a
family history of brucellosis. The study by Ahmetagić et al.
determined that 67% of the patients’ families were involved in
animal husbandry, and 58% had a family history of brucellosis.
In the research conducted by Buzgan et al., it was reported
that 42.3% of patients came from families engaged in animal
husbandry, while 17.8% had a family history of brucellosis.
Tanır et al. reported that 57.8% of patients lived in rural areas
and 42.2% in urban areas. In our study, the patient’s mean age
was 11.26 ± 4.705 years; 58.3% were male, and 41.7% were
female (10-14).Additionally, 55.3% of the patients lived in rural areas,
and 44.7% resided in the city center. A family occupation of
animal husbandry was reported in 48.5% of the patients, and
a family history of brucellosis in 36.9%. This data indicates that
brucellosis is increasing among children in areas where the
disease is common, especially in individuals residing in rural
settings and whose families are engaged in animal husbandry.
Brucellosis is a multisystemic disease affecting various
organ systems, leading to a diverse and often nonspecific
clinical presentation. In the study conducted by Gündeşlioğlu
et al., it was reported that 59% of patients presented with
fever, 41% with arthralgia, 38% with leg pain, 25% with
fatigue, and 17% with weight loss (15). Bosilkovski et al.
noted that the most common presenting complaints were
fever (78%), arthralgia (72%), sweating (64%), fatigue (60%),
and headache (33%) (16). In our study, arthralgia was the
most prevalent presenting complaint, noted in 88.3% of the
patients. Fever and fatigue were also common, observed in
65% of the patients each.
Hematological complications are frequently encountered
in brucellosis, as it can primarily affect the lymphoreticular
system. In the study by El-Koumi et al., anemia was observed
in 43% of the patients, leukopenia in 38%, leukocytosis in
20%, and pancytopenia in 18% (17). Kaman et al. found
anemia in 31.7% of the patients, leukopenia in 10.6%,
thrombocytopenia in 4.8%, and pancytopenia in 1.9% (18).
Our study detected anemia in 36.9% of the patients upon
evaluating complete blood count parameters. Additionally,
neutropenia was found in 10.7%, thrombocytopenia in 8.7%,
and pancytopenia in 3.9%. When examining the relationship
between serum antibody levels and these complications,
the Brucella capture titer did not significantly differ with
the presence of pancytopenia, bicytopenia, or neutropenia.
Regular monitoring of hematological parameters in
brucellosis patients is essential, along with timely intervention
if necessary.
Acute phase reactants typically increase in inflammatory
infections such as brucellosis, although they may sometimes
remain normal. CRP and ESR are commonly measured acute
phase reactants. Demiroğlu et al. reported CRP elevation in
59.6% of their patients and sedimentation elevation in 61.6%
(19). In the study by Jia et al., CRP elevation was found in 44.2%
and sedimentation elevation in 64.7% (20). In our research,
58.3% of patients had elevated sedimentation rates, while
68.6% had elevated CRP levels. Although our findings align
with the existing literature, it is crucial to note that CRP and
sedimentation values are not specific indicators of brucellosis.
The definitive diagnosis of brucellosis is established
by culturing the infectious agent from blood samples. It is
important to note that the absence of growth in blood culture
does not exclude the diagnosis. In the study by Özdem et al.,
the growth rate in blood culture was documented at 40.2%, while Ahmetagić et al. reported it at 25.6% (12,13). In our
study, growth was detected in 20 out of the 53 patients from
whom blood culture samples were obtained, corresponding
to a growth rate of 37.7%. In all 20 patients with positive blood
cultures, the identified microorganism was B. melitensis. This
finding emphasizes the importance of collecting sufficient
and accurate samples for blood culture and extending culture
incubation times in the laboratory to improve the chances of
isolating the organism.
Cardiovascular complications related to brucellosis include
endocarditis, myocarditis, pericarditis, mycotic aneurysms,
aortic valve abscess, and thrombophlebitis. Although the
incidence of endocarditis is not high, it remains one of the
most significant causes of brucellosis-related mortality (21).
In the study by Buzgan et al., the incidence of cardiovascular
complications due to brucellosis was reported at 0.7%, while
Ahmetagić et al. documented an endocarditis rate of 0.4%
(14,13). In our study, ECHO evaluations revealed mild mitral
regurgitation in seven patients and mild aortic regurgitation
in one patient.
Brucellosis frequently leads to complications within the
osteoarticular system. Çiftdoğan et al. reported a sacroiliitis
rate of 9.4% and spondylitis at 5.7% (22). Our study detected
MRI findings indicative of sacroiliitis in 7.7% of patients.
We emphasize the need to evaluate brucellosis patients for
sacroiliitis; imaging methods should be employed where
suspicion exists to avoid missing this complication.
Understanding the association between Brucella
capture titers and clinical parameters is essential for early
recognition of systemic involvement in pediatric brucellosis.
In our study, higher titers were significantly associated with
organomegaly and elevated CRP levels (p< 0.05), reinforcing
Brucella’s known tropism for the reticuloendothelial system.
Although no significant associations were observed with
thrombocytopenia, ESR, liver enzyme elevation, blood culture
positivity, or sacroiliitis, these parameters remain important
in comprehensive evaluation. Interestingly, lower Brucella
titers were found in patients with mild valvular regurgitation
on echocardiography, suggesting that minor cardiac findings
may not parallel serological activity. Nonetheless, ECHO
screening can be valuable in prolonged or atypical cases.
In our study, while Brucella capture titer demonstrated a
weak positive correlation with CRP in the univariate analysis,
this association did not reach statistical significance in
the multivariate linear regression model (p= 0.583). This
discrepancy suggests that the observed correlation may be
secondary to shared variance with other inflammatory markers,
such as ESR, creatinine, or liver enzymes, rather than reflecting
a direct relationship. It is also possible that Brucella antibody
titers, being primarily indicators of immunological exposure,
may not accurately reflect the dynamic inflammatory burden
at the time of presentation, which is more directly captured
by acute phase reactants like CRP. These findings underscore
the importance of interpreting serological and inflammatory
markers in context, as relying solely on antibody titers could
lead to underestimation of ongoing systemic activity.
There is a scarcity of studies focusing on severe
presentations of brucellosis and the increased frequency
of complications associated with bacteremia. Özdem et
al. observed that hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were
more prevalent among patients with bacteremia (12).
While no significant differences were noted in leukocyte
counts, neutrophil counts, or lymphocyte counts, patients
with detectable growth in blood cultures showed a higher
frequency of thrombocytopenia and significantly elevated
serum CRP, ALT, and AST levels (23). Apa et al. indicated that
in patients with positive blood culture growth, occurrences
of organomegaly, CRP, ALT, and AST values were significantly
higher compared to those in patients without detected growth
in blood cultures (24). Furthermore, a study by Chunhua et al.
in China found that CRP levels were significantly elevated,
while platelet and albumin values were lower in patients with
growth in blood cultures (25).
In our study, platelet values were significantly lower in
patients with positive blood cultures. Although differences in
WBC, Hb, and albumin levels were not statistically significant,
a trend showed that these values tended to be lower. In
contrast, ESR, ALT, AST, and CRP levels were higher in patients
with detected growth. Additionally, we observed increased
hepatomegaly and splenomegaly among patients with
positive blood cultures, further reinforcing prior findings.
Our study demonstrates that fever, fatigue, muscle pain,
and arthralgia are common presenting complaints in patients
with brucellosis. An increase in acute phase reactants,
alongside elevations in complete blood count parameters and
transaminases, may also be observed. When hepatomegaly
and/or splenomegaly are present in endemic regions,
brucellosis should be included in the differential diagnosis
for children exhibiting the symptoms above, as well as in the
physical examination findings and laboratory results.
While the definitive diagnosis of infections is typically
established through the detection of growth in blood
cultures, the data from our study reveal a relatively low growth
rate (37.7%). This underscores the necessity for alternative
diagnostic methods when diagnosing such patients, as
reliance solely on blood culture results may lead to missed
diagnoses.
In summary, while Brucella capture titer and ESR levels
were not correlated concerning disease-related organ
involvement and complication development, the negative
correlation found between CRP levels and platelet count, as
well as the positive correlation between CRP and creatinine levels, suggests that CRP may serve as an essential predictor
of systemic involvement and the potential for complications.
Patients exhibiting elevated CRP levels and positive blood
culture results should be closely monitored during treatment
through regular complete blood count and biochemical tests,
as a decline in platelet count could lead to complications.
From a clinical perspective, the associations observed in
this study offer valuable implications for the early recognition
and management of pediatric brucellosis. The inverse
relationship between CRP levels and platelet count may reflect
a heightened inflammatory state that contributes to bone
marrow suppression or peripheral platelet consumption. In
everyday clinical practice, such findings may help clinicians
identify patients at risk for hematologic complications or
more severe disease progression. Similarly, the positive
correlation between CRP and creatinine suggests that
systemic inflammation could be linked with early renal stress
or subclinical kidney involvement, which may otherwise go
undetected in children. These correlations, although modest,
highlight the potential utility of CRP not just as an inflammatory
marker, but also as a predictor of disease severity and organ
involvement. Given that CRP, platelet count, and creatinine
are standard, cost-effective tests available in most healthcare
settings, their combined interpretation may improve risk
stratification in endemic areas where advanced diagnostic
modalities are not readily accessible. Therefore, integrating
such parameters into clinical algorithms could facilitate timely
intervention, minimize complications, and ultimately improve
patient outcomes.
Our findings indicate that brucellosis can affect multiple
organ systems, demonstrating the need to understand its
clinical and laboratory characteristics thoroughly. Continuous
monitoring is essential to prevent additional complications if
treatment is delayed or not administered correctly.
Limitation
The main limitation of the study is the lack of data on
the patients’ post-treatment status and the results of the
response to treatment in a disease that can recur and whose
complications can be seen over time. The main reason for this
is that the standard treatment for the disease is a minimum of
six weeks, and the patients did not attend regular follow-up
visits or continue their follow-up at other centres.
Conclusion
Brucellosis remains a significant zoonotic disease that
poses serious health risks, particularly in areas where
animal husbandry is prevalent. The complexity of its
clinical presentation and variabilities in laboratory findings
underscores the necessity for heightened awareness
among healthcare providers to facilitate timely diagnosis
and treatment. Future studies are critical for enhancing our
understanding of brucellosis and its complications, thus
improving patient outcomes and guiding public health
strategies effectively.
Finally, it is vital to emphasize that preventive measures
and education are the most effective approach to combating
this disease. Public authorities, including the Ministry of Food
Agriculture and Livestock and the Ministry of Health, play
a significant role. The incidence of brucellosis, a zoonotic
disease, can be progressively reduced with appropriate
management strategies.
REFERENCES
1
Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new
global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6(2):91-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6
2
Tanir G, Tufekci SB, Tuygun N. Presentation, complications, and
treatment outcome of brucellosis in Turkish children. Pediatr Int
2009;51(1):114-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.2008.02661.x
3
Qasim SS, Alshuwaier K, Alosaimi MQ, Alghafees MA, Alrasheed A,
Layqah L, et al. Brucellosis in Saudi children: Presentation, complications, and treatment outcome. Cureus 2020;12(11):e11289. https://doi.
org/10.7759/cureus.11289
4
Özdem S, Tanır G, Öz FN, Yalçınkaya R, Cinni RG, Savaş Şen Z, et al. Bacteremic and nonbacteremic Brucellosis in children in Turkey. J Trop Pediatr 2022;68(1):fmab114. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmab114
5
Ahmetagić S, Porobić Jahić H, Koluder N, Čalkić L, Mehanić S, Hadžić
E, et al. Brucellosis in children in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the period 2000 - 2013. Med Glas (Zenica) 2015;12(2):177-82. https://doi.
org/10.17392/811-15
6
Buzgan T, Karahocagil MK, Irmak H, Baran AI, Karsen H, Evirgen O, et al.
Clinical manifestations and complications in 1028 cases of brucellosis:
a retrospective evaluation and review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis
2010;14(6):e469-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2009.06.031
7
Özgür Gündeşlioğlu Ö. Brucella infection in children: evaluation of 148
pediatric patients. J Clin Anal Med 2019;10(1). https://doi.org/10.4328/
JCAM.5956
8
Bosilkovski M, Krteva L, Caparoska S, Labacevski N, Petrovski M.
Childhood brucellosis: Review of 317 cases. Asian Pac J Trop Med
2015;8(12):1027-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtm.2015.11.009
9
El-Koumi MA, Afify M, Al-Zahrani SH. A prospective study of brucellosis
in children: relative frequency of pancytopenia. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2013;5(1):e2013011. https://doi.org/10.4084/mjhid.2013.011
10
Kaman A, Öz FN, Fettah A, Yaşar Durmuş S, Aydın Teke T, Tanır G. Clinicoepidemiological findings of childhood brucellosis in a tertiary care
center in Central Anatolia: with the emphasis of hematological findings. Turk J Pediatr 2022;64(1):10-8. https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2020.3075
11
Demiroğlu YZ, Turunç T, Alişkan H, Colakoğlu S, Arslan H. Bruselloz: 151
olgunun klinik, laboratuvar ve epidemiyolojik özelliklerinin retrospektif
değerlendirilmesi [Brucellosis: retrospective evaluation of the clinical,
laboratory and epidemiological features of 151 cases]. Mikrobiyol Bul
2007;41(4):517-27.
12
Seleem MN, Boyle SM, Sriranganathan N. Brucellosis: Are-emerging
zoonosis. Vet Microbiol 2010;140(3-4):392-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
vetmic.2009.06.021
13
Jia B, Zhang F, Lu Y, Zhang W, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. The clinical features of
590 patients with brucellosis in Xinjiang, China with the emphasis on the
treatment of complications. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017;11(5):e0005577.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005577
14
Mandel GL, Bennet JE, Bennett DR. Bennett‘s principles and practice
of infectious diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone;
2010:3495-522.
15
Çiftdoğan DY, Aslan S. Osteoarticular involvement of brucellosis in pediatric patients: clinical and laboratory characteristics. Turk J Pediatr
2020;62(2):199-207. https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2020.02.005
16
Demir T, Orhan B. Seroprevalence of brusellosis in Kirsehir province and
significance of serological and biochemical tests in the diagnosis of
brucellosis: Selçuk Tıp Derg 2012;28(3):173-7.
17
Apa H, Devrim I, Memur S, Günay I, Gülfidan G, Celegen M, et al. Factors affecting Brucella spp. blood cultures positivity in children. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2013;13(3):176-80. https://doi.org/10.1089/
vbz.2012.0997
18
Qie C, Cui J, Liu Y, Li Y, Wu H, Mi Y. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics
of bacteremic brucellosis. J Int Med Res 2020;48(7):300
19
El-Sayed A, Awad W. Brucellosis: Evolution and expected comeback.
Int J Vet Sci Med 2018;6(Suppl):S31-S35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijvsm.2018.01.008
20
Gür A, Geyik MF, Dikici B, Nas K, Cevik R, Sarac J, et al. Complications
of brucellosis in different age groups: a study of 283 cases in southeastern Anatolia of Turkey. Yonsei Med J 2003;44(1):33-44. https://doi.
org/10.3349/ymj.2003.44.1.33
21
Jin M, Fan Z, Gao R, Li X, Gao Z, Wang Z. Research progress on complications of Brucellosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023;13:1136674. https://
doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1136674
22
Yagupsky P, Morata P, Colmenero JD. Laboratory diagnosis of human Brucellosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2019;33(1):e00073-19. https://doi.
org/10.1128/CMR.00073-19
23
Ulu-Kilic A, Metan G, Alp E. Clinical presentations and diagnosis of brucellosis. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov 2013;8(1):34-41. https://doi.
org/10.2174/157489113805290746
24
Turkish Hematology Association laboratory guide, 1-2014. Available
from: https://www.thd.org.tr/thdData/Books/971/bolum-ii-tamkan-sayimi.pdf (Accessed date: 20.03.2025).
25
Konuş OL, Ozdemir A, Akkaya A, Erbaş G, Celik H, Işik S. Normal liver,
spleen, and kidney dimensions in neonates, infants, and children: evaluation with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171(6):1693-8.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.171.6.9843315